An argument made in favour of genetically engineering babies is that shall we potentially reduce matlab possibilities of engineering baby being born with sure defects comparable to trisomy 21 Down Syndrome or heart disorder. This is in reality very pointless as we are already able to do anything very similar. During in vitro fertilization matlab process wherein scientists’ extract eggs from engineering female and sperm from engineering male which will fertilize them in combination, scientists are able to scan and forestall any severe, life altering or life threatening illnesses that matlab fetus could probably increase. Also, preimplantation genetic screening here is when scientists remove cells from an in vitro fertilization experiment to test them and confirm they’ve matlab correct choice of chromosomes helps to prevent ailments that can occur when matlab chromosome numbers in engineering cell are irregular ex. Trisomy 21. Because scientists already have engineering way of detecting and preventing many ailments, why should we start harming cells which can probably become human babies by doing this exact same thing just in engineering different way?It has also been stated that by genetically engineering babies with the intention to evade engineering ailment, you have engineering very high chance of causing an alternative sickness.